Sunday, August 26, 2007

The Middle East, Part 1

POTENTIAL TARGETS AND FUTURE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATIONS
AND WHAT THAT MEANS TO OUR DESIRE FOR GLOBAL DOMINATION

So, playing the devil's advocate and humoring nay-sayers, if America intends to conquer the world, what would be the best and therefore the most logical next step towards accomplishing that goal? We are currently in the process of securing the majority of the known oil in the world. It just so happens that in order for a military the size of America's to operate and get things done, a vast amount of oil is required, and to kill two birds with one stone, we are keeping it out of the hands of potential threats by getting it first. The first on the list is rogue governments operating in the Middle East and the most visible one those at the time, was Iraq and apparently after that ---- Iran.
-----Though Iran could cause even more trouble than Iraq is right now, and god knows how long our forces will be tied up there until we can confidently move on, that is out of the question, for now. If we ever do get around to invading, our next target would likely be North Korea but at the writing of the article, NK's government appears to be more willing in dealing with Nuclear protection people. That is a brief list and discussion of primary military targets being waged right now and possibly in the future. Now I would like to move on to what the post-Bush administration might look like and how these people are going to approach the preceding military intervention plans.
-----It seems very likely that the Democrats are going to take power after Dubya and his cronies but that doesn't necessarily mean the war is going to end anytime soon. A hasty retreat and another war against Iraq that remains unfinished business would surely prove to be a problem and threat to America's future. What would Hillary or Barack's approaches likely be? They might finish the Iraq war but I cannot imagine their administration nor the American people allowing another hairy war anytime soon. To finalize the opinion in what wars with North Korea or Iran would look like, if we fight the traditional "Tank on tank" style of warfare we would rule militarily as always but if the people refuse to cooperate with us another unconventional war will ensue. So hopefully we can squash their ability to fight us in any way but directly and post-invasion/nation-building operates smoothly after major military activity ceases.

No comments: